Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Limitations and Data Gaps at Village and Block Levels on Welfare Schemes of Rural Poor Households


Affiliations
1 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


There are limitations and data gaps at village and block levels on welfare schemes of rural poor households. Data is an important input to measure the impact of a scheme. However, the government offices did not collect statistics on welfare schemes. So, it is difficult to assess actual impact of particular schemes on poor households. No data are available at taluka and block levels in respect of important socio-economic indicators such as quality education, per capita income, poverty ratio, monthly expenditure, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. Two conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, the record keeping system is not well established and not a part of system or practice. Secondly, the government functionaries were hesitant to divulge any details of spending on the schemes. Record keeping system needs to be strengthened to achieve higher impact on the targeted groups and correction of mistakes. Data sets lead researchers to find out the answers of some basic research questions.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Limitations and Data Gaps at Village and Block Levels on Welfare Schemes of Rural Poor Households

Abstract Views: 684  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kailas Thaware
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


There are limitations and data gaps at village and block levels on welfare schemes of rural poor households. Data is an important input to measure the impact of a scheme. However, the government offices did not collect statistics on welfare schemes. So, it is difficult to assess actual impact of particular schemes on poor households. No data are available at taluka and block levels in respect of important socio-economic indicators such as quality education, per capita income, poverty ratio, monthly expenditure, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. Two conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, the record keeping system is not well established and not a part of system or practice. Secondly, the government functionaries were hesitant to divulge any details of spending on the schemes. Record keeping system needs to be strengthened to achieve higher impact on the targeted groups and correction of mistakes. Data sets lead researchers to find out the answers of some basic research questions.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2016%2Fv58%2Fi3%2F147831