Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Optimization of Welding Parameters in Tig Welding of Martensitic Stainless Steel AISI 420


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Martensitic stainless steels are hard, brittle and notch sensitive. They are least weldable in the stainless steel family; crack formation during welding is frequent. Hydrogen induced cracks may appear even few hours after welding. Retention of mechanical properties (strength, ductility, hardness etc) by the welded joint is a matter of concern. All these matters make welding martensitic stainless steel challenging for engineers. In the present work, focus is given on the selection of optimum TIG welding parameter for welding of martensitic stainless steel AISI 420. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the joint has been taken as output response parameter. A regression equation has been developed by response surface methodology (RSM) to predict the response parameter as a function of input parameters. BP-ANN (Back propagation artificial neural network) model has also been developed to establish a correlation between response and process parameters. Process optimization has also been tried by using desirability function approach and genetic algorithm (GA). TIG welding has been done successfully without any major defects by using a preheat up to 250°C, and optimal UTS is evaluated by GA and RSM along with ANN.

Keywords

Martensitic Stainless Steel, Tig Welding, Optimization, Mathematical Modeling.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Isfahany, A.N., Saghafian, H. and Borhani, G., The effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of AISI420 martensitic stainless steel, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol.509, pp.3931–3936, 2011.
  • Davis, J.R., Corrosion of Weldments, ASM International, Materials Park, USA, 2006.
  • Kose, C. and Kacar, R., The effect of preheat & post weld heat treatment on the laser weldability of AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel, Materials and Design, Vol.64, pp.221– 226, 2014.
  • Lippord, J.C. and Kotecki, D.J., Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless steels, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp.56-86, 2005.
  • Castro, R. and Cadenet, J.J., Welding metallurgy of stainless and heat resisting steels, Cambridge University Press, London, pp.45-66, 2005.
  • Choi, Y.S., Kim, J.G., Park, Y. and Park, J.Y., Austenitizing treatment influence on the electrochemical corrosion behavior of 0.3C–14Cr–3Mo martensitic stainless steel, Materials Letters, Vol.61, pp.244–247, 2007.
  • Carrouge, D., Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. and Woollin, P., Effect of d-ferrite on impact properties of supermartensitic stainless steel heat affected zones, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, Vol.9, No. 5, pp.377-389, 2004.
  • Anselmo, N., May, J.E., Mariano, N.A., Nascente, P.A.P. and Kuri, S.E., Corrosion behavior of supermartensitic stainless steel in aerated and CO2-saturated synthetic seawater, Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol.428, pp.73–79, 2006.
  • Della Rovere, C.A., Aquino, J.M., Ribeiro, C.R., Silva, R., Alcantara, N.G. and Kuri, S.E., Corrosion behavior of radial friction welded supermartensitic stainless steel pipes, Materials and Design, Vol.65, pp.318–327, 2015.
  • Baghjari, S.H. and Mousavi, S.A.A.A., Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser welding parameters and subsequent post-weld heat treatment on microstructure and hardness of AISI 420 stainless steel, Materials and Design, Vol.43, pp.1-9, 2013.
  • Andrews, K.W., Empirical formula for the calculation of some transformation temparatures, Journal of Iron and Steel Institute, Vol.203, pp.721-727, 1965.
  • Kurt, B., Orhan, N., Somunkiran, I. and Kaya, M., The effect of austenitic interface layer on microstructure of AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel joined by keyhole PTA welding process, Materials and Design, Vol.30, pp.661–664, 2009.
  • Yilmaz, R. and Türkyilmazoglu, A., Tensile Properties of Martensitic Stainless Steel Weldments, Advanced Materials Research, Vol.23, pp.319-322, 2007.
  • Kiaee, N. and Aghaie-Khafri, M., Optimization of gas tungsten arc welding process by response surface methodology, Materials and Design, Vol.54, pp.25–31, 2014.
  • Gunaraj, V. and Murugan, N., Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.88, pp.266–275, 1999.
  • Elatharasana, G. and Senthil Kumar, V.S., An experimental analysis and optimization of process parameter on friction stir welding of AA 6061-T6 aluminum alloy using RSM, Procedia Engineering Vol.4, pp.1227–1234, 2013.
  • Benyounis, K.Y., Olabi, A.G. and Hashmi, M.S.J., Optimizing the laser-welded butt joints of medium carbon steel using RSM, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.164–165, pp.986–989, 2005.
  • Islam, M., Buijk, A., Rais-Rohani, M. and Motoyama, K., Process parameter optimization of lap joint fillet weld based on FEM–RSM–GA integration technique. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol.79, pp.127–136, 2015.
  • Rambabu, G., Naik, D.B., Rao, C.H.V., Rao, K.S. and Reddy, G.M., Optimization of friction stir welding parameters for improved corrosion resistance of AA2219 aluminum alloy joints, Defence Technology, Vol.11, pp.330-337, 2015.
  • Satheesh, M. and Dhas, J.E.R., Multi objective optimization of flux cored arc weld parameters using fuzzy based desirability function, International Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.37, pp.175-187, 2013.
  • Periyasamy, P., Mohan, B., Balasubramanian, V., Rajakumar, S. and Venugopal, S., Multiobjective optimization of friction stir welding parameters using desirability approach to join Al/SiCp metal matrix composites, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society, Vol.23, pp.942-955, 2013.
  • Busacca, P.G., Marseguerra, M. and Zio, E., Multiobjective Optimization by Genetic Algorithms: Application to Safety Systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.72, pp.59-74, 2001.
  • Kim, D. and Rhee, S., Optimization of Arc Welding Process Parameters using a Genetic Algorithm, Welding Journal, July, pp.184-189, 2001.
  • Sette, S., Boullart, L. and Langenhove, L., Optimizing a Production Process by a Neural Network/Genetic Algorithm Approach, Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, Vol.9, No. 6, pp.681-689, 1996.
  • Sudhakaran, R., Senthil Kumar, K.M., Jayaram, R., Pushparaj, A., Praveen, C. and Venkat Prabhu N., Effect of Welding Process Parameters on Weld Bead Geometry and Optimization of Process Parameters to Maximize Depth to Width Ratio for Stainless Steel Gas Tungsten Arc Welded Plates Using Genetic Algorithm, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol.62, No.1, pp.76-94, 2011.
  • Correia, D.S., Gonçalves, C.V., Cunhada, S.S. and Ferraresi Jr. V.A., Comparison between genetic algorithms and response surface methodology in GMAW welding optimization, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.160, pp.70–76, 2005.
  • Correia, D.S., Gonçalves, C.V., Sebastio, S.C. Jr. and Ferraresi, V.A., GMAW welding optimization using genetic algorithms, Journal of Brazing Society, Vol.26 , pp.28-33, 2004.
  • Nagesh, D.S. and Datta, G.L., Prediction of Weld Bead Geometry and Penetration in Shielded Metal-Arc Welding Using Artificial Neural Networks, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.123, pp.303–312, 2002.
  • Douglas, C.M., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
  • Balasubramanian, K.R., Sankaranarayanasamy, K. and Buvanashekaran, G., Analysis of Laser Welding Parameters Using Artificial Neural Network, International Journal for the Joining of Materials, 18/December (3/4), pp.99–104, 2006.
  • Balasubramanian, K.R., Buvanashekaran, G. and Sankaranarayanasamy, K., Mathematical and ANN Modeling of Nd:YAG Laser Welding of Thin SS Sheets, Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, Vol.6/2, pp.56–60, 2007.
  • Yagnanarayana, B., Artificial Neural Networks, Prentice-Hall, India, 1999.
  • Dubey, A.K. and Yadava, V., Laser Beam Machining—A Review, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol.48, pp.609–628, 2008.
  • Kim, I.S., Son, J.S., Park, C.E., Lee, C.W. and Prasad Yarlagadda, K.D.V., A Study on Prediction of Bead Height in Robotic Arc Welding Using a Neural Network, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.130–131, pp.229–234, 2002.

Abstract Views: 665

PDF Views: 10




  • Optimization of Welding Parameters in Tig Welding of Martensitic Stainless Steel AISI 420

Abstract Views: 665  |  PDF Views: 10

Authors

Abhishek Ghosh
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India
Pradip Kumar Pal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India
Goutam Nandi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India

Abstract


Martensitic stainless steels are hard, brittle and notch sensitive. They are least weldable in the stainless steel family; crack formation during welding is frequent. Hydrogen induced cracks may appear even few hours after welding. Retention of mechanical properties (strength, ductility, hardness etc) by the welded joint is a matter of concern. All these matters make welding martensitic stainless steel challenging for engineers. In the present work, focus is given on the selection of optimum TIG welding parameter for welding of martensitic stainless steel AISI 420. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the joint has been taken as output response parameter. A regression equation has been developed by response surface methodology (RSM) to predict the response parameter as a function of input parameters. BP-ANN (Back propagation artificial neural network) model has also been developed to establish a correlation between response and process parameters. Process optimization has also been tried by using desirability function approach and genetic algorithm (GA). TIG welding has been done successfully without any major defects by using a preheat up to 250°C, and optimal UTS is evaluated by GA and RSM along with ANN.

Keywords


Martensitic Stainless Steel, Tig Welding, Optimization, Mathematical Modeling.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.22485/jaei%2F2016%2Fv86%2Fi3-4%2F130845