Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Systematic Review of Research on Pedagogical Practices for Communication Skills in Engineering Education


Affiliations
1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The authors carried out a review study on the pedagogy for teaching communication skills (CS) in engineering higher education institutions with a view to firstly present the trend on the instructional pedagogical approaches used in an engineering classroom and secondly, to show the impact of these approaches on learners' development of CS. In order to address the research questions, we adopted 'Systematic Literature Review' as a research methodology and reviewed empirical research studies published between the year 2001 and 2021 exploring electronic database. Having followed the review protocols, we finally selected 26 research articles for a detailed analysis and synthesis. In regard with number of publications, the trends placed the USA at the top position which was followed by India. Overall, we found a lack of experimental research, subsequently a lack of evidence-based teaching practice, in the domain of pedagogy for developing CS leading to the assumption of still prevalent conventional lecture method of teaching in the CS classroom which is further held responsible for poor CS among engineering graduates. The teaching trend indicates that engineering institutions across nations are increasingly becoming aware of evidenced-based teaching approaches and are adopting innovative, learner-centered methods blended with ICT tools to facilitate the process of developing CS, along with other generic skills which has positive impact on learners' development of skills and attributes. The findings have implications for both; research and classroom teaching.

Keywords

Communication Skills, Engineering Education, Instructional Pedagogy, Systematic Literature Review.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Albakrawai, H. D. M., & Almutairi, F.M. (2013). The effect of ESP program on the engineering students' proficiency at the university of Tabuk. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(3), 117-124.
  • Al Riyami, T. K. (2021). Omani graduates’ English communication skills: Employers’ perspectives. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 17(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/lthe-01-2021-0007
  • Aviv, R. (2007). Don’t be shy. Retrieved 30 January 2008 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/educatio n/edlife/reticence.html?fta=y&pagewanted=all
  • Balzotti, J., & Rawlins, J. D. (2016). Clientbased pedagogy meets workplace simulation: Developing social processes in the Arisoph case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59 (2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2016.2561082
  • Bania, J., & Dubey, R. (n.d.). The Covid-19 Pandemic and Social Science (Qualitative) Research: An Epistemological Analysis. In https://www.guninetwork.org/report/covid-19-pandemic-and-social-science-qualitative-research-epistemological-analysis.
  • Baren, M. R., & Watson, J. (1993). Developing communications skills in engineering classes. Proceedings professional communication conference the new face of technical communication: People, processes, products, October 1993, 432-437. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1993.593906
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  • Blom, A., & Saeki, H. (2011, April). Employability and Skill Set of Newly Graduated Engineers in India (Working Paper Series No. 5640). Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5640.
  • Bodnar, C. A., & Clark, R. M. (2017). Can game-based learning enhance engineering communication skills? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2016.2632838
  • Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103 (1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038
  • Bowering, R. (2013, June). Invited paper - Preparing the global engineer: How learning to teach in a Service-Learning project develops effective communication skills in engineering students. ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-17251
  • Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027.
  • Choi, E. M. (2013). Applying inverted classroom to software engineering education. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2013.v3.205
  • Choudhury, P. K. (2019). Student assessment of quality of engineering education in India: Evidence from a field survey. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2015-0004
  • Clement, A., & Murugavel, T. (2015). English for employability: A case study of the English language training need analysis for engineering students in India. English Language Teaching, 8 (2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n2p116
  • Cochrane, T. (2009, June), Enhancing the oral presentation skills of engineering students: Technology to the rescue with the Virtual I Presenter (Vip). 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—4913
  • Craig, J. (June 25, 2016). Teaching Oral Communication at a Russian university: Helping English language learners present their engineering design [Paper presentation]. ASEE International forum, New orleans, Louisiana.
  • Cretu, D.M.; Ho, Y.-S. The Impact of COVID-19 on Educational Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065219.
  • Dannels, D. P., Anson, C. M., Bullard, L., & Peretti, S. (2003). Challenges in learning communication skills in Chemical engineering. Communication Education, 52(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302454
  • Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduate shave poor communication skills: What the literature says. Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--18809
  • Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109
  • Du, J. (2021). English applied ability teaching reform of mechanical design and manufacturing in ESP teaching mode. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1820 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1820/1/012017
  • Felder, R. M., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education vi: Making reform happen. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(3), 208–215.
  • Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x
  • Freedman, A., & Artemeva, N. (1998). Learning to teach writing to engineers. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Redactology, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.420
  • Froyd, J. E., & Lohmann, J. R. (2014). Chronological and Ontological Development of Engineering Education as a Field of Scientific Inquiry. In Johri, A., & Olds B. M. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, pp. 3–26. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139013451.003.
  • Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(special centennial issue), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2012.2190167
  • Gabriele, G. A. (2005, July). Advancing engineering education in a flattened world. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3), 285–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00852.x
  • Gömleksi˙z, M. N. (2007, October). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students (Case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433343.
  • Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
  • Grahame, K.S., & Keyvani, L. (2018, July). Preparing first-year engineering students for a career where communication skills matter. [Paper presentation). 2018 FYEE Conference, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA. https://peer.asee.org/31416
  • Gray, F. E. (2010). Specific Oral Communication Skills Desired in New Accountancy Graduates. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909356350.
  • Haghighi, K. (2005, October). Quiet no longer: Birth of a new discipline. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 351–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00862.x
  • Heitmann, G. (1996). Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799608923395
  • Irudayasamy, J., Souidi, N. M., & Hankins, C. (2020) Impact of an ESP course on English language proficiency of undergraduate engineering students: A case study at Dhofar University. International Journal of Higher Education, 9 (2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p309
  • Jabarullah, N. H., & Hussain, H. I. (2019). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in technical and vocational education in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Training, 61(5), 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2018-0129.
  • Jennings, A., & Ferguson, J. (1995). Focusing on communication skills in engineering education. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381575
  • Johannes, M. N., & Kasteren, V. (1996). Interdisciplinary teaching within engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21 (4), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799608923424
  • Kadam, D. M., & Sawant, S. Y. (2020). Modified Reciprocal Teaching: Cooperative Learning Technique for Enhancing Communication Skills of First Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education Transform, 33(Special issue).
  • Kaddour, K. B. (2020). Developing English communication skills through project-based learning: The case of ENSAM engineering students. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.53.12
  • Kakepoto, I., Habil, H., Omar, N. a. M., Boon, Y., & Iqbal, S. M. Z. (2012). The Picture of Modern Workplace Environment and Oral Communication Skills of Engineering Students of Pakistan. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(5), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.5p.42
  • Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012). The impact of blended learning on communication skills and teamwork of engineering students in Multivariable Calculus. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 56, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.662]
  • Kassim, H., & Ali, F. (2010). English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace: Feedback from the industry. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.002.
  • Kaushal, U. & Talwar T. (2021). Exploring the communi c a tion skills of Indi an undergraduates: A partial ethnographic study. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning , 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2020-0217.
  • Keane, A . & Gibson, I. S. (1999). Communication trends in engineering firms: Implications for undergraduate engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2), 115–121.
  • Khan, S.M. & Thayniath, S. (2020). Facilitating aural-oral skills of engineering students through the flipped classroom. TEST Engineering & Management, 82, 154–167.
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. http://artemisa.unicauca.edu.co/~ecaldon/docs/spi/kitchenham_2004.pdf
  • Kulhanek, A., Butler, B., & Bodnar, C. A. (2019, June 30). Motivating first- year engineering students through gamified homework. Educational Action Research, 29 (5), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1635511
  • Labun, C. (2011). Teaching engineering communication to first year engineering students. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3771
  • Lamont, G., & Lambert, S. (2020). Teaching first-year students to communicate problem analysis and investigation with an engineering-specific writing model. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14165
  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. British Medical Journal, 339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
  • Luo, H., Yang, T., Kwon, S., Zuo, M., Li, W., & Choi, I. (2020). Using virtual reality to identify and modify risky pedestrian behaviours amongst Chinese children. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(1), 108–113
  • Male, S., & King, R. (2014). Improving industry engagement in engineering degrees. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education. Massey University.
  • Markes, I. (2006). A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600911704
  • Meier, R. L., Williams, M., & Humphreys, M. S. (2000). Refocusing Our Efforts: Assessing NonTechnical Competency Gaps. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.21689830.2000.tb00539
  • Mills, J. E. & Treagust, D. F., (2003). Engineering education: Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, (2003). https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.132462.
  • Missingham, D. (2006.) The integration of professional communication skills into engineering education. Proceeding of EDU-COM International Conference, 346-357. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/91
  • Mohapatra, M., & Satpathy, S. (2014). English for Engineering Students: A study of the teachinglearning system in the Indian context. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19932227
  • Morreale, S. P., Valenzano, J. M., & Bauer, J. A. (2017). Why communication education is important: a third study on the centrality of the discipline’s content and pedagogy. Communication Education, 66(4), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265136.
  • Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009, April 23). Re-engineering graduate skills – a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902829281
  • Nelavai, N., & Ramesh, S. (2020). An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year Engineering Students: Poor Foundational Knowledge. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.118.
  • Nikolic, S., Stirling D., & Ros, M (2018) Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43(4), 538-551
  • Nutman, P. N. S. (1987). Communication skills for engineering students: An integrative approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 12 (4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043798708939383
  • Olawale, O., & Joshua, I. (2015). Employability and technical skills required to establish a smallscale automobile workshop. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (13). https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/22367
  • Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2020). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project-based learning. Research in Science & Amp; Technological Education, 40(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663
  • Paretti, M. C. (2008). Teaching communication in capstone design: The role of the instructor in situated learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (4), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x
  • Pollack-Wahl, J. A. (2000). It is time to stand up and communicate. Proceedings 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, USA, FIG-16-FIG-21
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Wiley.
  • Richardson, S. (2020). ‘Making the news: the impact of COVID-19 on international research partnerships. Ex Libris [available at https://exlibrisgroup.com/blog/covid-19-impactinternational-research-partnerships/].
  • Riemer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st Century engineer. Australasian. Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89–100. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/communication-skills-for-the-21st-century-engineer
  • Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity To Engage Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105 (2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs105.2.12.
  • Sakran, T. M. E., & Prescott, D. (2013). Poster presentations improve engineering students’ communication skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(7), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2013.1.7/61.7.75.86
  • Samavedham, L. & Ragupathi, J (2012). Facilitating 21st century skills in engineering student. The journal of Engineering Education, 26 (1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2012/v25i1-4/115232
  • Sampath, S., & Mekala, S. (2018). The impact of pedagogical intervention in developing the speaking proficiency of engineering students. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 26(2), 735–750.
  • Santos, D. (2019). English language learning for engineering students: Application of a visual-only video teaching strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21.
  • Selwyn, R., & Renaud-Assemat, I. (2020). Developing technical report writing skills in first- and second-year engineering students: A case study using self-reflection. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5 (1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1710550.
  • Shinge, J., & Kotabagi, S. (2020b). To improve presentation skills of the engineering students through a Vis-à-vis evaluation approach - A pedagogical experiment. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 350–356 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.168
  • Suarta, I. M., Suwintana, I. K., Sudhana, F. P., & Hariyanti, K. D. (2017) Employability skills required by the 21st century workplace: A literature review of labor market demand. Proceedings of Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 102, 337–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.58.
  • Tenório, Thyago & Bittencourt, Ig & Isotani, Seiji & Silva, Alan. (2016). Does peer assessment in on-line learning environments work? A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior. 64, 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.020.
  • Torres-Barreto, M. L., Castro Castaño, G. P., & Alvarez Melgarejo, M. (2020). Alearning model proposal focused on challenge-based learning. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.18260/3-1-1153-36023
  • Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Kleemola, K., Hailikari, T., Männikkö, I., & Toom, A. (2022). Systematic Review of Learning Generic Skills in Higher Education—Enhancing and Impeding Factors. Frontiers in Education, 7 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.885917.
  • Venkateshwara, U., & John, D. (2017). Integrating CLIL with CLT to develop speaking skills in the engineering Classroom. ESP Journal, 7, 44–53.
  • Waitz, I. A., & Barrett, E. C. (1997). Integrated teaching of experimental and communication skills to undergraduate Aerospace engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00292.x.
  • Warnock, J. N., & Mohammadi-Aragh, M. J. (2015). Case study: Use of problem-based learning to develop students’ technical and professional skills. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1040739
  • Willmot, P., & Colman, B. P. (2016b). Interpersonal skills in engineering education. 27th Australasian Association of Engineering Education (AAEE) Conference.
  • Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a Mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01042.x
  • Yang, L., Zhang, H., Shen, H., Huang, X., Zhou, X., Rong, G., & Shao, D. (2021). Quality Assessment in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Software Engineering Perspective. Information & Software Technology, 130, 106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106397.
  • Yasmin, M., & Yasmeen, A. (2021). Viability of outcome-based education in teaching English as second language to chemical engineering learners. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.04.005
  • Yeo, R. (2001). An integrative approach to the teaching of technical communication skills. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38 (1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/147032901300002891
  • Zaharim, A., Yusoff, Y. M., Mohamed, A., Omar, M. Z., Muhamad, N., & Mustapha, R. (2010). Practical framework of employability skills for engineering graduate in Malaysia. Global Engineering Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon.2010.5492478.
  • Zainuddin, S. Z. B., Pillai, S., Dumanig, F. P., & Phillip, A. (2019). English language and graduate employability. Education + Training, 61(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2017-0089

Abstract Views: 189

PDF Views: 0




  • A Systematic Review of Research on Pedagogical Practices for Communication Skills in Engineering Education

Abstract Views: 189  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kiran Vaghela
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India
Urvashi Kaushal
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India

Abstract


The authors carried out a review study on the pedagogy for teaching communication skills (CS) in engineering higher education institutions with a view to firstly present the trend on the instructional pedagogical approaches used in an engineering classroom and secondly, to show the impact of these approaches on learners' development of CS. In order to address the research questions, we adopted 'Systematic Literature Review' as a research methodology and reviewed empirical research studies published between the year 2001 and 2021 exploring electronic database. Having followed the review protocols, we finally selected 26 research articles for a detailed analysis and synthesis. In regard with number of publications, the trends placed the USA at the top position which was followed by India. Overall, we found a lack of experimental research, subsequently a lack of evidence-based teaching practice, in the domain of pedagogy for developing CS leading to the assumption of still prevalent conventional lecture method of teaching in the CS classroom which is further held responsible for poor CS among engineering graduates. The teaching trend indicates that engineering institutions across nations are increasingly becoming aware of evidenced-based teaching approaches and are adopting innovative, learner-centered methods blended with ICT tools to facilitate the process of developing CS, along with other generic skills which has positive impact on learners' development of skills and attributes. The findings have implications for both; research and classroom teaching.

Keywords


Communication Skills, Engineering Education, Instructional Pedagogy, Systematic Literature Review.

References