

Methodological Approach to Assess the Library Catalogues
The study focused on assessing the quality of catalogue records of university libraries in Karnataka available through their Web OPACs. The study assessed the various parameters of cataloguing records which determines the quality of the records. This study explains the methodology adopted for this research work in detail. The methodology gives describes the design of the study and procedures, the universities and sample records, instruments, methods of data collection, and treatment of data. The researcher identified nine of the existing 44 universities of Karnataka for the collection of data for the study. Only nine universities provided access to their catalogue records via the internet-based OPACs and hence, they have been selected.
Keywords
Web OPAC, Catalogue, Metadata, Cataloguing Quality, Cataloguing Procedures, MARC 21, Metadata Quality, Library Automation, KOHA, University Libraries.
User
Font Size
Information
- Avdoyan, L. (1995). Cataloging quality/ : A Library of Congress symposium. In Opinion Papers: Vol. 6. Quality cataloguing (p. 31). Washington D. C.: Library of Congress.
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2016). An investigation into the diligence in metadata records of Mysore University Library. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 36(6), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.36.6.10608
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018a). An examination of the quality of catalogue records of management institutes in India. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 55(2), 73–81. https:// doi.org/10.17821/srels/2018/v55i2/119051
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018b). Quality of cataloguing records of university libraries in Karnataka: A study. Gyankosh: The Journal of Library and Information Management, 9(2), 66–74. https:// doi.org/10.5958/2249-3182.2018.00007.2
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018c). What constitutes cataloguing quality? a review of issues and perceptions. ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, 1(1), 85–93.
- Graham, P. S. (1990). Quality in cataloguing: Making distinctions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(4), 213-218.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316447003000308
- Library of Congress Cataloging Forum. (1995). Cataloging quality: A Library of Congress symposium: Opinion papers, no. 6. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress Cataloging Forum.
- Zeng, L. (1992). An evaluation of the quality of Chinese-language records in the OCLC OLUC database and a study of a rulebased data validation system for online Chinese cataloging (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
- Zeng, L. (1993). Quality control of Chinese-language records using a rulebased data validation system-part 1: An evaluation of the quality of Chinese-language records in the OCLC OLUC database. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 16(4), 25-66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v16n04_03
- Zeng, L. (1994b). Quality control of Chinese-language records using a rule-based data validation system-part 2: A study of a rule-based data validation system for online Chinese cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 18(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J104v18n01_0

Abstract Views: 513

PDF Views: 4