Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

State of Agricultural Extension reforms in India and the need of convergence


Affiliations
1 Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
2 ZTM & BPD Unit, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
3 OUAT, Bhubaneswar 751 003
 

Extension reforms play a significant role in catalysing the extant policies and provisions that are affecting the extension service across India. Although the country has seen a series of reforms in the past seven decades, the changing contours of agriculture over the years demand new sets of interventions and reform measures. Regimes in the past decades have brought a series of measures to strengthen the extension system. The present study found that the most of the reforms were concentrated on a single theme and even the multiple reforms were overlapping with similar mandates. This resulted in poor performance and poor accessibility to the needy households. Moreover, during the pandemic the existing system reforms showed a fair amount of refinement. Therefore, the study highlights the importance of convergence across common themes of various interventions brought in to enhance the extension services
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agricultural census 2015–16; http://agcensus.nic.in/document/agcen1516/T1_ac_2015_16.pdf (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  • Babu, S. C., Glendenning, C. J., Asenso-Okyere, K. and Govindarajan, S. K., Farmers’ information needs and search behaviors. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC, 2012, pp. 1–37.
  • Economic Survey (2018–19); https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/economicsurvey/ (accessed on 30 November 2020).
  • Babu, S. C., Joshi, P. K., Glendenning, C. J., Kwadwo, A. O. and Rasheed, S. V., The state of agricultural extension reforms in India: strategic priorities and policy options. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2013, 26(2), 159–172.
  • Babu, S. C., Joshi, P. K. and Sulaiman, V. R., Agricultural extension reforms: lessons from India. In Agricultural Extension Reforms in South Asia, Academic Press, 2019, pp. 41–60.
  • Glendenning, C. J., Babu, S. and Asenso-Okyere, K., Review of agricultural extension in India. Are farmers information needs being met. 2010, p. 55.
  • Meena, M., Singh, K. M. and Swanson, B., Indian agricultural extension systems and lessons learnt: a review. J. AgriSearch, 2015, 2(4), 281–285.
  • Lele, U., Pretty, J., Terry, E., Trigo, E. and Klousia, M., Transforming agricultural research for development. In Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development, Montpellier, France, 2010.
  • Ferroni, M. and Zhou, Y., Review of agricultural extension in India. Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture, 2011, pp. 1–49.
  • Swanson, B., Singh, K. M. and Reddy, M. N., A decentralized, participatory, market-driven extension system: The ATMA model in India. In Paper Presented at the International Food Policy Research Institute Conference Advancing Agriculture in Developing Countries through Knowledge and Innovation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 7–9 April 2008; http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168648 (accessed on 22 July 2022).
  • Sulaiman, R. V. and Hall, A. J., The fallacy of universal solutions in extension: Is ATMA the new T&V. LINK News, September 2008.
  • Sulaiman, R. V., Agricultural extension in India: current status and ways forward. In Background Paper prepared at the Round Table Consultation on Agricultural Extension, Beijing, China, March 2012, pp. 15–17.
  • GoI, Doubling of farmers’ income, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, 2017; http://agricoop.gov.in/sites/default/files/DFI%20Volume%2011.pdf
  • Claire, J., Glendenning, S. B. and Kwadwo, A., Review of agricultural extension in India. Are farmers’ information needs being met. International Food Policy Research Institute. Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Zone, South Africa, 2010.
  • Gautam, H. R., Bhardwaj, M. L. and Kumar, R., Climate change and its impact on plant diseases. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105, 1685–1691.
  • Sulaiman, R. V., Agricultural extension: involvement of private sector. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Department of Economic Analysis and Research, 2003.
  • Shekara, P. C., Private extension in India: Myths, realities, apprehensions and approaches. National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, Hyderabad, India, 2001, pp, 1–160.
  • Sharma, V. P., Cyber extension: the extension approach for new millennium, 2002; http://www.manage.gov.in/managelib/faculty/VPSharma.htm
  • Adhiguru, P., Birthal, P. S. and Kumar, B. G., Strengthening pluralistic agricultural information delivery systems in India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2009, 22(347-2016-16740), 71–80.
  • Carney, D., Changing public and private roles in agricultural service provision. Overseas Development Institute, Natural Resource Group, London, 1998.
  • Sajesh, V. K. and Suresh, A., Public-sector agricultural extension in India: a note. Rev. Agrarian Stud., 2016, 6(1), 116–131.
  • Mahendra Dev, S., A note on trends in public investment in India. In Proceedings/Projects Series PP-069-SMD2, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, 2012; http://www.igidr.c.in/newspdf/srijit/PP-069-SMD2.pdf
  • Mukherjee, A., Bahal, R., Roy Burman, R. and Dubey, S. K., Factors contributing farmers’ association in Tata Kisan Sansar: a critical analysis. Indian Res. J. Extens. Educ., 2012, 12(2), 81–86.
  • Gulati, A., Sharma, P., Samantara, A. and Terway, P., Agriculture extension system in India: review of current status, trends and the way forward. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, 2018.
  • Chander, M. and Rathod, P., Reorienting priorities of extension and advisory services in India during and post COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Indian J. Extens. Educ., 2020, 56(3), 1–9.
  • Jayne, T. S., Villarreal, M., Pingali, P. L. and Hemrich, G., Interactions between the agricultural sector and the HIV/AIDS pandemic: implications for agricultural policy, Food Security International Development Papers 54046, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University (No. 1094-2016-88102), 2004; https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/mididp/54046.html (accessed on 22 July 2022).
  • Mukherjee, A., Bahal, R., Roy Burman, R. and Dubey, S. K., Conceptual convergence of pluralistic extension at Aligarh District of Uttar Pradesh. J. Community Mobilization Sustain. Dev., 2012, 7(1&2), 85–94.
  • Sulaiman, V. R., Hall, A. and Suresh, N., Effectiveness of private sector extension in India and lessons for the new extension policy agenda. Agricultural Research & Extension Network, 2005, Paper No. 14.
  • Mukherjee, A. and Maity, A., Public–private partnership for convergence of extension services in Indian agriculture. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(9), 1557–1563.
  • KVK-ATMA, Convergence model in Madhya Pradesh reviewed. Bhopal Zonal Project Directorate, Zone VII, Jabalpur, 28 December 2013; http://www.icar.org.in/en/node/7168
  • Rivera, W. and Alex, G., Extension system reform and the challenges ahead. J. Agric. Educ. Extens., 2004, 10(1), 23–36.
  • Ravishankar, K., Private extension in India and a swot analysis. In Private Extension in India: Myth, Realities, Apprehension and Approaches, MANAGE, Hyderabad, 2001, pp. 32–38.
  • Prasad, R. M., Private extension system – options and issues. In Private Extension in India: Myth, Realities, Apprehension and Approaches, MANAGE, Hyderabad, 2001, pp. 39–44.
  • Sulaiman, R. V. and Sadamate, V. V., Privatizing agricultural extension in India. Policy Paper 10, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP), New Delhi, 2000.
  • Kidd, A. D., Lamers, J. P. A., Ficarelli, P. P. and Hoffmann, V., Privatising agricultural extension: caveat emptor. J. Rural Stud., 2000, 16(1), 95–102.
  • Haug, R., Some leading issues in international agricultural extension, a literature review. J. Agric. Educ. Extens., 1999, 5(4), 263–274.

Abstract Views: 296

PDF Views: 150




  • State of Agricultural Extension reforms in India and the need of convergence

Abstract Views: 296  |  PDF Views: 150

Authors

Rabindra Nath Padaria
Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
P. C. Ranjith
ZTM & BPD Unit, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
Radhika Tanwar
Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
Simantini Shasani
OUAT, Bhubaneswar 751 003

Abstract


Extension reforms play a significant role in catalysing the extant policies and provisions that are affecting the extension service across India. Although the country has seen a series of reforms in the past seven decades, the changing contours of agriculture over the years demand new sets of interventions and reform measures. Regimes in the past decades have brought a series of measures to strengthen the extension system. The present study found that the most of the reforms were concentrated on a single theme and even the multiple reforms were overlapping with similar mandates. This resulted in poor performance and poor accessibility to the needy households. Moreover, during the pandemic the existing system reforms showed a fair amount of refinement. Therefore, the study highlights the importance of convergence across common themes of various interventions brought in to enhance the extension services

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv123%2Fi3%2F264-270